<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s OpenSocial having growing pains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osakasteve.com/2008/01/02/googles-opensocial-having-growing-pains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osakasteve.com/2008/01/02/googles-opensocial-having-growing-pains/</link>
	<description>"All the geek that's fit to news." --J.D. Lewin</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric L</title>
		<link>http://osakasteve.com/2008/01/02/googles-opensocial-having-growing-pains/#comment-19535</link>
		<dc:creator>eric L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osakasteve.com/2008/01/02/googles-opensocial-having-growing-pains/#comment-19535</guid>
		<description>i find it interesting that the sub-paragraph you choose to quote here has the least to do with open social. i will agree that open social is a failure. but that doesn't seem to be what you are focusing on. if you want to argue that google does not have any success with social network, i have two words for you: You Tube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i find it interesting that the sub-paragraph you choose to quote here has the least to do with open social. i will agree that open social is a failure. but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be what you are focusing on. if you want to argue that google does not have any success with social network, i have two words for you: You Tube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
